Data · measured 2026-10-12

Tokens in Japanese

How many tokens does Japanese text use, compared with English? We measured the same copy in both languages with OpenAI's two main tokenizers.

Cost vs English, o200k_base1.56×GPT-4o and newer models
Cost vs English, cl100k_base2.10×GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 era
Characters per token1.51o200k_base (English: 4.51)
Rank of 29271 is the cheapest relative to English
Saved by o200k_base26%fewer tokens than cl100k_base

What the numbers say

The same website copy is 200 tokens in English and 313 tokens in Japanese on the newer o200k_base encoding, a ratio of 1.56×. On the older cl100k_base encoding the Japanese copy needs 421 tokens, which is 2.10× the English count of 200. At the same price per token, the same message costs about 1.56× as much in Japanese on the newer encoding. Among the 29 non-English languages we measured, Japanese ranks number 27 from the cheapest.

The newer encoding made a real difference: o200k_base used 26% fewer tokens than cl100k_base for Japanese, compared with 34% across all the non-English languages in the data. That is less than average, so Japanese gained less from the newer vocabulary than most.

Why Japanese? Japanese mixes three scripts in one sentence: kanji (borrowed Chinese characters), and the hiragana and katakana syllabaries. Particles and verb endings in hiragana are very common and very short, which means a sentence has many small pieces for a tokenizer to handle, and rarer kanji can be split into several byte-level tokens.

East Asian scripts have thousands of characters, each of which is three bytes in UTF-8. A tokenizer cannot include every character as its own piece, so common characters get a single token and rarer ones are broken into byte-level pieces. At the same time these languages need far fewer characters to say the same thing, which is why total cost, not characters per token, is the number to compare.

Example

How a Japanese sentence is split into tokens

This is the tagline of this site in Japanese. Each shaded block is one token (or a few tokens that together make one character) on o200k_base.

あるデバイスでコピーして、別のデバイスで貼り付け。アプリもアカウントも不要です。

40 characters become 30 tokens on o200k_base and 38 tokens on cl100k_base. The English tagline, "Copy text on one device and paste it on another — no app, no account.", is 69 characters and 17 tokens on o200k_base and 17 on cl100k_base.

Want to see your own text? Paste it into the token calculator and compare the two tokenizers.

Comparison

Japanese next to English and the closest languages

LanguageCharactersTokens
o200k_base
Tokens
cl100k_base
× English
o200k_base
× English
cl100k_base
EnglishEnglish 9022002001.00×1.00×
Hindiहिन्दी 9102988781.49×4.39×
Thaiไทย 7733017101.50×3.55×
UkrainianУкраїнська 9673045141.52×2.57×
Bengaliবাংলা 8493099981.54×4.99×
Japanese日本語 4743134211.56×2.10×

See all 30 languages, with a chart and CSV and JSON downloads, on token cost by language.

What it means for your bill

API prices are per token, so the ratio is also a price ratio. If a prompt costs $1.00 in English on o200k_base, the equivalent Japanese prompt costs about $1.56, and about $2.10 on cl100k_base. A document of 1,000 Japanese characters is roughly 660 tokens on o200k_base. These are estimates from one sample: translated text is never exactly the same length as the original, and your text may be formal, technical or full of names, which changes the ratio.

To turn tokens into money, enter your provider's input and output prices per million tokens in the token calculator. For how pricing works, see how LLM API pricing works.

How to use fewer tokens with Japanese text

  1. Use a model with the newer tokenizer. For Japanese, o200k_base used 26% fewer tokens than cl100k_base in this sample, so a GPT-4o-class model needs fewer tokens than an older one for the same text.
  2. Count before you send. Paste a typical message into the token calculator to see the real count, then multiply by the number of requests.
  3. Keep fixed instructions short. A system prompt that is sent with every request is paid for every time. Writing the standing instructions in English is often cheaper per token than in Japanese; test that answers stay as good as you need.
  4. Cut what is not needed. Remove greetings, repeated context and long examples. The guide to reducing token usage has more.
  5. Be careful with emoji, rare characters and unusual formatting. They are often split into several byte-level tokens each.
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

How many tokens is Japanese text?

In our measurement, the same website copy that is 200 tokens in English (902 characters) is 313 tokens in Japanese on o200k_base (474 characters) and 421 tokens on cl100k_base. As a rule of thumb, 1,000 characters of Japanese come to about 660 tokens on o200k_base and about 888 on cl100k_base.

Is Japanese more expensive than English in GPT-4o?

Slightly to noticeably, depending on the text. On o200k_base, the encoding used by GPT-4o and newer OpenAI models, the Japanese copy needs 1.56× the English token count, so at the same price per token the same message costs about 1.56× as much. It was 2.10× on the older cl100k_base.

Which tokenizer is better for Japanese?

o200k_base needed 26% fewer tokens than cl100k_base for Japanese in this sample. Across all 29 non-English languages in the data, the average saving was 34%, so Japanese improved less than average.

Why does Japanese need more tokens than English?

Japanese mixes three scripts in one sentence: kanji (borrowed Chinese characters), and the hiragana and katakana syllabaries. Particles and verb endings in hiragana are very common and very short, which means a sentence has many small pieces for a tokenizer to handle, and rarer kanji can be split into several byte-level tokens. East Asian scripts have thousands of characters, each of which is three bytes in UTF-8. A tokenizer cannot include every character as its own piece, so common characters get a single token and rarer ones are broken into byte-level pieces. At the same time these languages need far fewer characters to say the same thing, which is why total cost, not characters per token, is the number to compare.

Does this apply to Claude, Gemini or Llama?

Not directly. Other providers train their own tokenizers, so counts and ratios differ. These figures describe two OpenAI encodings only. Use your provider's own token counter before relying on a number for billing.

How was this measured?

We counted the tokens of the site's own copy in each language (tagline, two about paragraphs and four how-to steps) with the o200k_base and cl100k_base encodings from gpt-tokenizer 4.0.0, on 2026-10-12, and divided by the English count. It is one sample of marketing-style text, so other kinds of text, such as code or legal prose, will give different ratios.

More

Other languages and guides

Other languages: Korean · Chinese (Simplified) · Chinese (Traditional) · Hindi · Bengali · Thai · Russian · Vietnamese · Greek · Turkish · Indonesian · German · Spanish · Portuguese · French

Share this tool