Data · measured 2026-10-12

Tokens in Chinese (Simplified)

How many tokens does Chinese (Simplified) text use, compared with English? We measured the same copy in both languages with OpenAI's two main tokenizers.

Cost vs English, o200k_base1.02×GPT-4o and newer models
Cost vs English, cl100k_base1.48×GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 era
Characters per token1.52o200k_base (English: 4.51)
Rank of 2911 is the cheapest relative to English
Saved by o200k_base31%fewer tokens than cl100k_base

What the numbers say

The same website copy is 200 tokens in English and 204 tokens in Chinese (Simplified) on the newer o200k_base encoding, a ratio of 1.02×. On the older cl100k_base encoding the Chinese (Simplified) copy needs 295 tokens, which is 1.48× the English count of 200. So on the newer encoding Chinese (Simplified) costs only a modest amount more than English. Among the 29 non-English languages we measured, Chinese (Simplified) ranks number 1 from the cheapest.

The newer encoding made a real difference: o200k_base used 31% fewer tokens than cl100k_base for Chinese (Simplified), compared with 34% across all the non-English languages in the data. That is less than average, so Chinese (Simplified) gained less from the newer vocabulary than most.

Simplified Chinese is the cheapest language in our data on the newer encoding, at 1.02× English, while Traditional Chinese needs 1.32×. The two are written differently, so they cannot be compared character for character.

Why Chinese (Simplified)? Simplified Chinese packs a lot of meaning into each character and has no spaces between words, so the same message is far shorter in characters than in English. Frequent characters tend to be one token each.

East Asian scripts have thousands of characters, each of which is three bytes in UTF-8. A tokenizer cannot include every character as its own piece, so common characters get a single token and rarer ones are broken into byte-level pieces. At the same time these languages need far fewer characters to say the same thing, which is why total cost, not characters per token, is the number to compare.

Example

How a Chinese (Simplified) sentence is split into tokens

This is the tagline of this site in Chinese (Simplified). Each shaded block is one token (or a few tokens that together make one character) on o200k_base.

在一台设备上复制,在另一台设备上粘贴。无需应用,无需账号。

29 characters become 21 tokens on o200k_base and 31 tokens on cl100k_base. The English tagline, "Copy text on one device and paste it on another — no app, no account.", is 69 characters and 17 tokens on o200k_base and 17 on cl100k_base.

Want to see your own text? Paste it into the token calculator and compare the two tokenizers.

Comparison

Chinese (Simplified) next to English and the closest languages

LanguageCharactersTokens
o200k_base
Tokens
cl100k_base
× English
o200k_base
× English
cl100k_base
EnglishEnglish 9022002001.00×1.00×
Chinese (Simplified)简体中文 3102042951.02×1.48×
IndonesianBahasa Indonesia 9322182741.09×1.37×
PortuguesePortuguês 9422192391.09×1.20×
DutchNederlands 9282202681.10×1.34×
SpanishEspañol 9202242481.12×1.24×

See all 30 languages, with a chart and CSV and JSON downloads, on token cost by language.

What it means for your bill

API prices are per token, so the ratio is also a price ratio. If a prompt costs $1.00 in English on o200k_base, the equivalent Chinese (Simplified) prompt costs about $1.02, and about $1.48 on cl100k_base. A document of 1,000 Chinese (Simplified) characters is roughly 658 tokens on o200k_base. These are estimates from one sample: translated text is never exactly the same length as the original, and your text may be formal, technical or full of names, which changes the ratio.

To turn tokens into money, enter your provider's input and output prices per million tokens in the token calculator. For how pricing works, see how LLM API pricing works.

How to use fewer tokens with Chinese (Simplified) text

  1. Use a model with the newer tokenizer. For Chinese (Simplified), o200k_base used 31% fewer tokens than cl100k_base in this sample, so a GPT-4o-class model needs fewer tokens than an older one for the same text.
  2. Count before you send. Paste a typical message into the token calculator to see the real count, then multiply by the number of requests.
  3. Keep fixed instructions short. A system prompt that is sent with every request is paid for every time. Writing the standing instructions in English is often cheaper per token than in Chinese (Simplified); test that answers stay as good as you need.
  4. Cut what is not needed. Remove greetings, repeated context and long examples. The guide to reducing token usage has more.
  5. Be careful with emoji, rare characters and unusual formatting. They are often split into several byte-level tokens each.
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

How many tokens is Chinese (Simplified) text?

In our measurement, the same website copy that is 200 tokens in English (902 characters) is 204 tokens in Chinese (Simplified) on o200k_base (310 characters) and 295 tokens on cl100k_base. As a rule of thumb, 1,000 characters of Chinese (Simplified) come to about 658 tokens on o200k_base and about 952 on cl100k_base.

Is Chinese (Simplified) more expensive than English in GPT-4o?

Slightly to noticeably, depending on the text. On o200k_base, the encoding used by GPT-4o and newer OpenAI models, the Chinese (Simplified) copy needs 1.02× the English token count, so at the same price per token the same message costs about 1.02× as much. It was 1.48× on the older cl100k_base.

Which tokenizer is better for Chinese (Simplified)?

o200k_base needed 31% fewer tokens than cl100k_base for Chinese (Simplified) in this sample. Across all 29 non-English languages in the data, the average saving was 34%, so Chinese (Simplified) improved less than average.

Why does Chinese (Simplified) need about as many tokens than English?

Simplified Chinese packs a lot of meaning into each character and has no spaces between words, so the same message is far shorter in characters than in English. Frequent characters tend to be one token each. East Asian scripts have thousands of characters, each of which is three bytes in UTF-8. A tokenizer cannot include every character as its own piece, so common characters get a single token and rarer ones are broken into byte-level pieces. At the same time these languages need far fewer characters to say the same thing, which is why total cost, not characters per token, is the number to compare.

Does this apply to Claude, Gemini or Llama?

Not directly. Other providers train their own tokenizers, so counts and ratios differ. These figures describe two OpenAI encodings only. Use your provider's own token counter before relying on a number for billing.

How was this measured?

We counted the tokens of the site's own copy in each language (tagline, two about paragraphs and four how-to steps) with the o200k_base and cl100k_base encodings from gpt-tokenizer 4.0.0, on 2026-10-12, and divided by the English count. It is one sample of marketing-style text, so other kinds of text, such as code or legal prose, will give different ratios.

More

Other languages and guides

Other languages: Japanese · Korean · Chinese (Traditional) · Hindi · Bengali · Thai · Russian · Vietnamese · Greek · Turkish · Indonesian · German · Spanish · Portuguese · French

Share this tool